Dubai Telegraph - Trump vs Harris: Competing visions for a warming world

EUR -
AED 3.865039
AFN 71.961868
ALL 97.885367
AMD 409.705534
ANG 1.898038
AOA 960.733931
ARS 1055.061215
AUD 1.613881
AWG 1.894109
AZN 1.787029
BAM 1.951539
BBD 2.126437
BDT 125.855234
BGN 1.956342
BHD 0.396578
BIF 3110.579445
BMD 1.052283
BND 1.414399
BOB 7.293078
BRL 6.086683
BSD 1.053191
BTN 88.848028
BWP 14.387453
BYN 3.446543
BYR 20624.740218
BZD 2.122845
CAD 1.469502
CDF 3014.78969
CHF 0.929776
CLF 0.037101
CLP 1023.776253
CNY 7.619996
CNH 7.625593
COP 4626.455438
CRC 534.824751
CUC 1.052283
CUP 27.885491
CVE 110.024795
CZK 25.350861
DJF 187.538784
DKK 7.458788
DOP 63.520417
DZD 140.573397
EGP 52.274979
ERN 15.78424
ETB 131.306162
FJD 2.388363
FKP 0.830585
GBP 0.832524
GEL 2.883571
GGP 0.830585
GHS 16.7185
GIP 0.830585
GMD 74.71233
GNF 9078.051459
GTQ 8.13025
GYD 220.338958
HKD 8.189863
HNL 26.613518
HRK 7.506205
HTG 138.346648
HUF 411.186809
IDR 16734.714279
ILS 3.929639
IMP 0.830585
INR 88.911049
IQD 1379.588093
IRR 44293.214291
ISK 145.520299
JEP 0.830585
JMD 166.933965
JOD 0.746386
JPY 162.676061
KES 136.007134
KGS 91.02957
KHR 4249.68174
KMF 491.94202
KPW 947.053999
KRW 1471.222726
KWD 0.323672
KYD 0.877684
KZT 523.167824
LAK 23125.51255
LBP 94319.785398
LKR 306.411046
LRD 190.622024
LSL 19.101997
LTL 3.107117
LVL 0.636515
LYD 5.138732
MAD 10.521031
MDL 19.167154
MGA 4930.189594
MKD 61.546561
MMK 3417.773046
MNT 3575.656436
MOP 8.443666
MRU 41.866002
MUR 48.839087
MVR 16.268296
MWK 1826.195708
MXN 21.380416
MYR 4.698412
MZN 67.293799
NAD 19.101997
NGN 1768.455747
NIO 38.755022
NOK 11.613586
NPR 142.154623
NZD 1.792324
OMR 0.40513
PAB 1.053101
PEN 3.996674
PGK 4.239684
PHP 62.126243
PKR 292.773138
PLN 4.342422
PYG 8247.914831
QAR 3.840515
RON 4.977085
RSD 117.020141
RUB 106.281009
RWF 1452.315514
SAR 3.95054
SBD 8.79238
SCR 14.332083
SDG 632.944958
SEK 11.610939
SGD 1.413951
SHP 0.830585
SLE 23.75528
SLL 22065.84631
SOS 601.88026
SRD 37.282669
STD 21780.126598
SVC 9.214882
SYP 2643.891613
SZL 19.091139
THB 36.458458
TJS 11.216013
TMT 3.682989
TND 3.324243
TOP 2.464553
TRY 36.27081
TTD 7.130433
TWD 34.270209
TZS 2791.031424
UAH 43.426878
UGX 3886.514989
USD 1.052283
UYU 45.021709
UZS 13526.469111
VES 48.861031
VND 26751.65603
VUV 124.929112
WST 2.937543
XAF 654.521833
XAG 0.033884
XAU 0.000395
XCD 2.843846
XDR 0.801343
XOF 654.521833
XPF 119.331742
YER 262.991742
ZAR 19.064031
ZMK 9471.810193
ZMW 29.146091
ZWL 338.834589
  • RBGPF

    59.6900

    59.69

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0800

    6.61

    -1.21%

  • SCS

    -0.0200

    13.07

    -0.15%

  • BCC

    -0.7700

    137.41

    -0.56%

  • CMSD

    -0.0836

    24.26

    -0.34%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.23

    -0.23%

  • BCE

    -0.3100

    27

    -1.15%

  • CMSC

    -0.0450

    24.52

    -0.18%

  • RIO

    -0.0400

    62.39

    -0.06%

  • NGG

    -0.3100

    63.27

    -0.49%

  • RELX

    -0.1800

    45.11

    -0.4%

  • GSK

    -0.1100

    33.35

    -0.33%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    37.08

    +0.4%

  • AZN

    -0.6000

    63.2

    -0.95%

  • VOD

    0.0200

    8.94

    +0.22%

  • BP

    -0.0100

    29.08

    -0.03%

Trump vs Harris: Competing visions for a warming world
Trump vs Harris: Competing visions for a warming world / Photo: Christian MONTERROSA - AFP/File

Trump vs Harris: Competing visions for a warming world

"Drill, baby, drill" versus championing green energy: Donald Trump and Kamala Harris offer starkly opposing visions on climate, with the outcome of the US presidential race poised to shape the planet's warming trajectory.

Text size:

Neither candidate has outlined a comprehensive platform on climate, an issue that remains far from the center of the US campaign, despite the country being the world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, after China.

But their positions are no mystery.

Former president Trump has long denounced climate change as a "hoax" and pledged to reverse the climate-friendly policies of the Biden-Harris administration if elected.

A Trump victory could significantly slow the pace of the green transition, dashing hopes of meeting critical long-term warming targets. A US retreat from climate diplomacy would undermine global efforts to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Even before the January inauguration, his election would immediately weaken the influence of US negotiators at the COP29 UN climate summit, set to begin just six days after the vote.

Greater commitments from wealthy nations like the United States are seen as essential to boosting financial support for vulnerable developing countries, a key focus of this year's talks.

During his presidency, Republican Trump withdrew from the landmark Paris Agreement and has vowed to do so again if reelected, after President Joe Biden restored US participation.

To meet its Paris obligations, the United States committed to the ambitious goal of cutting its greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030, compared to 2005 levels. By 2023, it had achieved an 18 percent reduction, according to the Rhodium Group.

"We have to really stay the course, and that would be a complete reversal under Trump," according to Leah Stokes, a political scientist at UC Santa Barbara, who specializes in climate.

"The outcome of the American election will have ramifications for the whole planet," she told AFP.

- 'Green New Scam' -

Harris, who attended COP28 where the United States played a key role in striking a deal to phase out fossil fuels, "is committed to continuing and building upon the United States' international climate leadership," according to her campaign website.

As a senator, she co-sponsored a "Green New Deal" resolution calling for a drastic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions -- dubbed the "Green New Scam" by Trump.

In 2019, as a Democratic primary candidate, she called for a ban on fracking -- a controversial and highly polluting process that has made the US a top producer of natural gas and crude oil but comes with steep costs to the climate as well as local water and air quality.

She has since changed her tune due to the political realities in Pennsylvania, a key swing state where the fracking industry plays an important economic role.

As she campaigns across the country, she has made little mention of climate change.

In her only televised debate with Trump, she defended the need for "diverse sources of energy," even boasting that under the Biden-Harris administration, "we have had the largest increase in domestic oil production in history."

This position has drawn quiet criticism from some supporters.

Still, she continues to enjoy broad backing from environmental groups, who are encouraged by her overall track record -- from taking on oil companies as California's attorney general to casting the tie-breaking vote on the "Inflation Reduction Act," which has driven unprecedented investment in green energy.

The IRA is frequently attacked by Trump, who has vowed to "rescind all unspent funds," but reversing a law is complex. Even some elected Republicans oppose the move, pointing to the benefits of the tax credits it provides.

- Deja vu -

Trump has also promised to cancel Joe Biden's moratorium on new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and end what he calls the "electric vehicle mandate" -- a reference to new car emissions standards aimed at accelerating the shift to electric vehicles, that are not, in fact, a mandate.

Other newly enacted Environmental Protection Agency rules, for example those aimed at drastically curbing carbon emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants, also face the chopping block.

"I do expect to see a fair amount of litigation over any efforts to repeal these regulations," Fatima Ahmed, of the climate consulting firm Boundary Stone, told AFP.

She's also heartened that state and local governments, along with the private sector, will continue advancing climate initiatives, as was seen during Trump's first term.

But even with local and private efforts pushing forward, the potential national impact remains staggering.

According to an analysis by Carbon Brief, which specializes in climate science and policy, a Trump victory could lead to an extra four billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions by 2030 compared to a Democratic president -- roughly the combined annual emissions of the European Union and Japan.

O.Mehta--DT