Dubai Telegraph - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 3.874351
AFN 70.672481
ALL 98.206772
AMD 409.529379
ANG 1.902292
AOA 961.98469
ARS 1053.240083
AUD 1.632197
AWG 1.893379
AZN 1.79736
BAM 1.951687
BBD 2.131209
BDT 126.134215
BGN 1.954399
BHD 0.397559
BIF 3057.359101
BMD 1.054807
BND 1.415032
BOB 7.2937
BRL 6.114617
BSD 1.055476
BTN 88.681275
BWP 14.429731
BYN 3.454254
BYR 20674.224038
BZD 2.127637
CAD 1.485258
CDF 3022.023436
CHF 0.935277
CLF 0.037481
CLP 1034.217927
CNY 7.628899
CNH 7.631342
COP 4683.966965
CRC 537.173181
CUC 1.054807
CUP 27.952395
CVE 110.596966
CZK 25.250021
DJF 187.460777
DKK 7.45828
DOP 63.714461
DZD 140.670985
EGP 52.059705
ERN 15.82211
ETB 128.686874
FJD 2.400689
FKP 0.832577
GBP 0.835371
GEL 2.88494
GGP 0.832577
GHS 16.824589
GIP 0.832577
GMD 74.891697
GNF 9102.987795
GTQ 8.151823
GYD 220.726985
HKD 8.212467
HNL 26.502077
HRK 7.524214
HTG 138.757615
HUF 408.109004
IDR 16773.546462
ILS 3.95511
IMP 0.832577
INR 89.063872
IQD 1382.325031
IRR 44399.482357
ISK 145.07861
JEP 0.832577
JMD 167.626783
JOD 0.747968
JPY 162.620745
KES 136.601561
KGS 91.244843
KHR 4271.970133
KMF 492.14678
KPW 949.326214
KRW 1472.870098
KWD 0.324375
KYD 0.879655
KZT 524.539682
LAK 23156.186098
LBP 94457.998459
LKR 308.360235
LRD 194.084919
LSL 19.218992
LTL 3.114572
LVL 0.638043
LYD 5.142227
MAD 10.562318
MDL 19.178769
MGA 4920.676648
MKD 61.480451
MMK 3425.973124
MNT 3584.235315
MOP 8.463746
MRU 42.150501
MUR 49.797854
MVR 16.297172
MWK 1831.145921
MXN 21.457915
MYR 4.71552
MZN 67.406123
NAD 19.218988
NGN 1756.254599
NIO 38.780033
NOK 11.691443
NPR 141.890359
NZD 1.798468
OMR 0.406127
PAB 1.055486
PEN 4.011473
PGK 4.240062
PHP 61.944657
PKR 292.923905
PLN 4.316188
PYG 8235.64615
QAR 3.840136
RON 4.976374
RSD 116.98134
RUB 105.533529
RWF 1444.031261
SAR 3.961836
SBD 8.850276
SCR 15.510982
SDG 634.470498
SEK 11.57129
SGD 1.415261
SHP 0.832577
SLE 23.842514
SLL 22118.787698
SOS 602.826263
SRD 37.251053
STD 21832.382474
SVC 9.235539
SYP 2650.234959
SZL 19.218979
THB 36.740526
TJS 11.251797
TMT 3.702374
TND 3.330558
TOP 2.470468
TRY 36.326303
TTD 7.166966
TWD 34.295483
TZS 2805.787901
UAH 43.598444
UGX 3873.837193
USD 1.054807
UYU 45.294985
UZS 13538.452675
VES 47.941006
VND 26781.558588
VUV 125.228848
WST 2.944591
XAF 654.571505
XAG 0.03487
XAU 0.000412
XCD 2.85067
XDR 0.795132
XOF 653.456945
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.570026
ZAR 19.209466
ZMK 9494.535692
ZMW 28.979211
ZWL 339.647536
  • CMSC

    -0.0300

    24.52

    -0.12%

  • RBGPF

    1.6500

    61.84

    +2.67%

  • RIO

    0.4500

    60.88

    +0.74%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    6.8

    +0.15%

  • NGG

    0.2300

    62.6

    +0.37%

  • SCS

    -0.0400

    13.23

    -0.3%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    8.75

    +0.8%

  • CMSD

    0.0422

    24.4

    +0.17%

  • BTI

    0.7500

    36.24

    +2.07%

  • RELX

    -1.5310

    44.419

    -3.45%

  • GSK

    -0.5459

    33.455

    -1.63%

  • BCC

    -0.8750

    139.475

    -0.63%

  • AZN

    -1.5200

    63.52

    -2.39%

  • BP

    -0.2050

    28.845

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    -0.0050

    26.835

    -0.02%

  • JRI

    -0.0375

    13.039

    -0.29%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

C.Masood--DT