Dubai Telegraph - Conservation efforts can shift nature loss to more vulnerable regions: study

EUR -
AED 4.046948
AFN 78.278251
ALL 98.923064
AMD 426.495569
ANG 1.972463
AOA 1009.805975
ARS 1185.295698
AUD 1.834938
AWG 1.98463
AZN 1.869557
BAM 1.956229
BBD 2.206915
BDT 132.799155
BGN 1.956037
BHD 0.41521
BIF 3248.972258
BMD 1.101807
BND 1.476431
BOB 7.552692
BRL 6.691712
BSD 1.092955
BTN 94.214829
BWP 15.427597
BYN 3.576902
BYR 21595.415078
BZD 2.195512
CAD 1.565332
CDF 3164.389655
CHF 0.92911
CLF 0.02875
CLP 1103.272628
CNY 8.086494
CNH 8.133451
COP 4874.669141
CRC 561.13083
CUC 1.101807
CUP 29.197883
CVE 110.289714
CZK 25.174057
DJF 194.63538
DKK 7.467684
DOP 68.565986
DZD 146.786018
EGP 56.951985
ERN 16.527103
ETB 144.120748
FJD 2.574427
FKP 0.865666
GBP 0.859398
GEL 3.03545
GGP 0.865666
GHS 16.941796
GIP 0.865666
GMD 78.780653
GNF 9459.20546
GTQ 8.429812
GYD 228.67124
HKD 8.550203
HNL 27.965266
HRK 7.533497
HTG 143.022048
HUF 408.704267
IDR 18649.29363
ILS 4.177666
IMP 0.865666
INR 95.380172
IQD 1431.833839
IRR 46399.830054
ISK 144.893197
JEP 0.865666
JMD 172.597109
JOD 0.781074
JPY 160.187847
KES 142.628755
KGS 95.920116
KHR 4373.980117
KMF 495.265851
KPW 991.600287
KRW 1629.047581
KWD 0.33896
KYD 0.910804
KZT 566.146862
LAK 23676.305361
LBP 97932.344575
LKR 326.80323
LRD 218.594022
LSL 21.28707
LTL 3.253349
LVL 0.666472
LYD 6.078417
MAD 10.445141
MDL 19.406349
MGA 5116.123198
MKD 61.501893
MMK 2313.116597
MNT 3867.086692
MOP 8.74744
MRU 43.269088
MUR 49.471398
MVR 16.978471
MWK 1895.216078
MXN 22.921522
MYR 4.955969
MZN 70.40288
NAD 21.28707
NGN 1729.010437
NIO 40.219742
NOK 12.084827
NPR 150.747147
NZD 1.984536
OMR 0.424166
PAB 1.092955
PEN 4.060847
PGK 4.513052
PHP 63.329101
PKR 306.806433
PLN 4.286966
PYG 8763.043147
QAR 3.984193
RON 4.976751
RSD 117.150707
RUB 94.729177
RWF 1547.44675
SAR 4.13775
SBD 9.170619
SCR 15.943823
SDG 661.655912
SEK 11.025015
SGD 1.485885
SHP 0.865847
SLE 25.077209
SLL 23104.340809
SOS 624.634298
SRD 40.604893
STD 22805.178119
SVC 9.564143
SYP 14325.206258
SZL 21.27296
THB 38.130781
TJS 11.875092
TMT 3.867342
TND 3.369255
TOP 2.580543
TRY 41.877694
TTD 7.412661
TWD 36.333154
TZS 2937.687091
UAH 45.022684
UGX 4056.909068
USD 1.101807
UYU 46.499364
UZS 14172.497332
VES 80.724907
VND 28657.997253
VUV 137.791365
WST 3.132669
XAF 656.104019
XAG 0.036257
XAU 0.000362
XCD 2.977688
XDR 0.815979
XOF 656.109975
XPF 119.331742
YER 270.35586
ZAR 21.652817
ZMK 9917.558102
ZMW 30.467104
ZWL 354.78137
  • RBGPF

    60.2700

    60.27

    +100%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    45.31

    -0.49%

  • SCS

    -0.4600

    9.74

    -4.72%

  • RIO

    -2.2400

    52.32

    -4.28%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.21

    +0.18%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    11.47

    +1.83%

  • CMSD

    -0.1000

    22.38

    -0.45%

  • BCC

    -1.9600

    89.93

    -2.18%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    62.74

    -0.26%

  • AZN

    -0.8900

    64.9

    -1.37%

  • GSK

    -0.7100

    34.13

    -2.08%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    8.36

    -0.24%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    8.19

    -1.95%

  • BP

    -1.0600

    26.11

    -4.06%

  • BCE

    -1.2100

    20.87

    -5.8%

  • BTI

    0.1200

    39.55

    +0.3%

Conservation efforts can shift nature loss to more vulnerable regions: study
Conservation efforts can shift nature loss to more vulnerable regions: study / Photo: Pablo PORCIUNCULA - AFP

Conservation efforts can shift nature loss to more vulnerable regions: study

Could restoring the environment in one place -- say by turning farmland in Europe into a nature reserve -- harm plants and animals on the other side of the planet?

Text size:

An international team of researchers on Thursday said these types of unintended consequences from well-meaning conservation efforts are more common than thought, yet are rarely considered or even properly understood.

In a new study, they warn that reducing farming and forestry in wealthy countries to meet local conservation goals can heap pressure on poorer regions to produce more food and timber.

The burden often falls on biodiversity hotspots rich in plant and animal species to make up this shortfall, said the study's lead author, Andrew Balmford.

These countries -- mostly in developing nations in Africa, Asia and South America -- are of much greater importance to nature yet pay the price for conservation gains in wealthier climes.

"In some cases, we might cause more harm than good," Balmford, from the University of Cambridge's Department of Zoology, told AFP.

The authors pointed to a case in the United States, where an effort to curb deforestation in old-growth forests simply shifted logging operations to neighbouring regions.

Balmford said a ban on domestic logging in China saw a sharp increase in timber imports from southeast Asia, a region of much higher biodiversity value.

It is a complex problem in terms of global trade, and one that is difficult to quantify.

For this study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Science, the authors applied real-world data to two hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the trap of so-called "biodiversity leakage".

- Tradeoffs -

In one, they found that rewilding a large soybean crop in Brazil would shift production elsewhere, but deliver a net gain for conservation because of the country's high biodiversity value.

But giving the same area of UK farmland back to nature would result in higher commodity imports from countries with greater plant and animal diversity, outweighing any local conservation gain.

The authors said the simple premise that intervening in one location could have knock-on impacts in another was hardly new.

Yet this uncomfortable reality had barely registered at the highest levels of government and global policymaking.

"At larger scale there is, extraordinarily, no mention of the problem" in the UN's flagship conservation policy to protect 30 percent of Earth's land and oceans by 2030, they said.

The UN's next biodiversity meeting is this month in Rome.

Balmford said Europe for example expected to set aside one-third of its land for nature and feed its people without also shifting the cost elsewhere.

"We can't always have our cake and eat it... there are some somewhat awkward tradeoffs there," he said.

Balmford said the authors -- conservation scientists and economists from over a dozen institutions -- were "passionate about conservation and very much want it to succeed".

This paper was "constructive criticism from within, but where we feel that there is a significant issue that has largely been overlooked in conservation, and that it's serious".

G.Rehman--DT