Dubai Telegraph - Revolution or mirage? Controversy surrounds new Alzheimer's drugs

EUR -
AED 3.897588
AFN 71.62565
ALL 97.2537
AMD 411.203272
ANG 1.913552
AOA 968.293905
ARS 1058.745012
AUD 1.627557
AWG 1.911648
AZN 1.807819
BAM 1.955455
BBD 2.143822
BDT 126.883565
BGN 1.95804
BHD 0.399961
BIF 3075.191117
BMD 1.061143
BND 1.421016
BOB 7.363046
BRL 6.140859
BSD 1.061762
BTN 89.662386
BWP 14.445129
BYN 3.47465
BYR 20798.394027
BZD 2.140123
CAD 1.480899
CDF 3044.418227
CHF 0.936171
CLF 0.037916
CLP 1046.211864
CNY 7.674607
COP 4713.329932
CRC 543.329624
CUC 1.061143
CUP 28.120278
CVE 110.729863
CZK 25.391006
DJF 188.586074
DKK 7.45901
DOP 63.933705
DZD 141.600995
EGP 52.213665
ETB 128.927564
FJD 2.404653
GBP 0.833113
GEL 2.907297
GHS 17.418672
GMD 75.870655
GNF 9158.721715
GTQ 8.204937
GYD 222.11867
HKD 8.254453
HNL 26.592299
HTG 139.651911
HUF 410.802767
IDR 16762.975014
ILS 3.985736
INR 89.551307
IQD 1390.096744
IRR 44679.406949
ISK 147.498979
JMD 168.710198
JOD 0.752456
JPY 164.232506
KES 137.417871
KGS 91.474118
KHR 4302.933102
KMF 488.523524
KRW 1494.624597
KWD 0.326418
KYD 0.884785
KZT 526.901752
LAK 23302.690344
LBP 95078.373015
LKR 310.479784
LRD 196.6824
LSL 19.280981
LTL 3.133278
LVL 0.641875
LYD 5.162473
MAD 10.527599
MDL 19.005538
MGA 4923.70171
MKD 61.609117
MMK 3446.549617
MOP 8.506897
MRU 42.335075
MUR 49.990475
MVR 16.405298
MWK 1841.082561
MXN 21.872228
MYR 4.708282
MZN 67.833584
NAD 19.281345
NGN 1774.951722
NIO 39.023514
NOK 11.770787
NPR 143.459418
NZD 1.793877
OMR 0.40856
PAB 1.061762
PEN 4.000181
PGK 4.260222
PHP 62.350627
PKR 295.050664
PLN 4.354234
PYG 8295.534619
QAR 3.863355
RON 4.976865
RSD 116.971889
RUB 104.249364
RWF 1445.806728
SAR 3.987149
SBD 8.850728
SCR 14.422986
SDG 638.273057
SEK 11.587852
SGD 1.421194
SLE 24.247182
SOS 605.912547
SRD 37.389344
STD 21963.508396
SVC 9.290797
SZL 18.707922
THB 36.991474
TJS 11.2858
TMT 3.72461
TND 3.339947
TOP 2.485304
TRY 36.467135
TTD 7.215065
TWD 34.443094
TZS 2824.618246
UAH 43.973732
UGX 3901.494647
USD 1.061143
UYU 44.764202
UZS 13614.459211
VES 47.430329
VND 26899.963703
XAF 655.872046
XCD 2.867791
XDR 0.799896
XOF 645.174431
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.099936
ZAR 19.251725
ZMK 9551.56176
ZMW 28.906256
ZWL 341.687469
  • RBGPF

    0.0300

    60.22

    +0.05%

  • BCC

    -2.0100

    141.13

    -1.42%

  • CMSC

    -0.1800

    24.54

    -0.73%

  • BCE

    -0.1600

    27.69

    -0.58%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1700

    7.16

    -2.37%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    13.67

    +0.15%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    24.75

    -0.85%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    62.9

    -1.97%

  • RIO

    -1.4000

    61.2

    -2.29%

  • JRI

    -0.3000

    13.22

    -2.27%

  • GSK

    -0.8300

    35.52

    -2.34%

  • RELX

    -1.2100

    46.59

    -2.6%

  • AZN

    0.4000

    65.19

    +0.61%

  • BTI

    0.0900

    35.24

    +0.26%

  • BP

    -0.7600

    28.16

    -2.7%

  • VOD

    -0.8500

    8.47

    -10.04%

Revolution or mirage? Controversy surrounds new Alzheimer's drugs
Revolution or mirage? Controversy surrounds new Alzheimer's drugs / Photo: ALAIN JOCARD - AFP/File

Revolution or mirage? Controversy surrounds new Alzheimer's drugs

Two new drugs, the first capable of slowing down the debilitating progression of Alzheimer's disease, have become embroiled in one of the biggest medical controversies in recent years.

Text size:

For their defenders, the drugs lecanemab and donanemab represent the first real chance to fight the disease after decades of research -- for detractors, they are another disappointment after a long line of costly failures.

"We have turned a corner" thanks to these treatments, British biologist John Hardy, who has been studying Alzheimer's since the 1990s, told AFP.

Rob Howard, a professor of old age psychiatry at University College London, was on the other side.

"I think that the drugs have been used to raise false and unrealistic hopes in people with Alzheimer's disease and their families," he said.

These opposing statements sum up the entrenched positions on the recently introduced drugs for Alzheimer's, the most common form of dementia which millions of people across the world suffer from.

Lecanemab, sold under the name Leqembi, was developed by US pharma firms Biogen and Eisai. Donanemab, developed by pharma giant Eli Lilly, is sold as Kisunla.

The controversy has seen countries take different stances on whether to approve the drugs or not.

The United States gave the green light to lecanemab in 2023, then donanemab earlier this year.

However the European Union rejected lecanemab in July, a bad omen for donanemab's chance of approval.

Last month, the UK steered a middle course, approving the use of lecanemab but not making it available on the state National Health Service.

What no one denies is that the two drugs are the most effective Alzheimer's treatments ever -- but their effectiveness is limited.

Both appear to reduce cognitive decline in patients at the onset of their disease by around 30 percent.

While that may seem high, it represents a relatively small difference over the year-and-a-half period when the studies were carried out.

"The benefits are so tiny as to be practically invisible in an individual patient," Howard said.

- Exorbitant cost -

For critics, there are not enough benefits to outweigh the risks of the drugs, which can sometimes cause brain swelling or bleeding that in rare cases has proved fatal.

And they are very expensive. At the prices being charged by Biogen and Eisai in the United States, lecanemab would cost 133 billion euros ($148 billion) if given to all eligible patients in the EU, according to a 2023 study.

Advocates of the drugs, including many neurologists, believe they can offer patients a few more precious months of autonomy.

They also believe that the effectiveness of the drugs could be multiplied if patients started taking them earlier in the disease's progression. This could soon be more practicable as research on diagnosing Alzheimer's more quickly has recently been making significant strides.

The differing national policies could also mean that poorer patients are left behind.

"We will see rich people going to the US" for the drugs, Hardy said.

The debate can be traced back in part to a seminal 1992 article by Hardy about how the disease actually works.

The article argues that clumps of protein called amyloid plaques -- a constant in the brains of Alzheimer's patients -- are not just one element among others, but the main factor triggering the disease.

Over the decades, many drugs targeting these amyloid plaques were developed, all of which failed -- until lecanemab and donanemab.

- Pressure from families -

The scepticism from some quarters about the new drugs could be because the previous ones were defended and even lauded by some, despite their ineffectiveness.

Christian Guy-Coichard, the head of French organisation Formindep which monitors medical conflicts of interest, accused Alzheimer's groups, researchers and pharmaceutical firms of being too close.

But France Alzheimer deputy director Benoit Durand said that very little of its funding came from Biogen/Eisai or Eli Lilly, instead pointing towards pressure for new treatments from patients' families.

"They don't understand" the EU's decision to turn down a breakthrough new drug, Durand told AFP. He also feared that laboratories could lose interest in Alzheimer's disease due to the setbacks.

Even within the pharmaceutical industry, some admit that past failures have not necessarily helped build trust.

A doctor working for Eli Lilly, who spoke on condition of anonymity, blamed its rival Biogen for overstating the benefits of previous treatment Aduhelm. The drug was controversially approved in the US in 2021 before being withdrawn.

"The Aduhelm studies were a mess," the doctor said.

The aftermath "did a lot of harm and sowed chaos in the discipline", the doctor added, pointing the finger at Biogen.

In response, Biogen told AFP that it was complying with "the principles of scientific research as well as legal and regulatory requirements".

But the Eli Lilly doctor defended the new treatments all the same, urging people to look to the future, not the past.

Like other specialists, he also acknowledged that other mechanisms besides amyloids that could be behind Alzheimer's need to be explored.

Given the disease's complexity, it is unlikely that "single-target treatments will achieve substantially larger effects" than lecanemab and donanemab, a group of experts wrote in the Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease last month.

But the new drugs are a "critical step" in Alzheimer's treatment, they added.

G.Gopinath--DT