Dubai Telegraph - Texas judge briefly lifts abortion ban for medical emergencies

EUR -
AED 3.849023
AFN 71.377105
ALL 98.713018
AMD 408.027217
ANG 1.888169
AOA 956.757159
ARS 1045.773778
AUD 1.6014
AWG 1.888888
AZN 1.790592
BAM 1.967019
BBD 2.115265
BDT 125.194055
BGN 1.966739
BHD 0.394852
BIF 3094.650597
BMD 1.047927
BND 1.412054
BOB 7.23929
BRL 6.078989
BSD 1.047676
BTN 88.429063
BWP 14.312633
BYN 3.428555
BYR 20539.367995
BZD 2.111745
CAD 1.460103
CDF 3008.598175
CHF 0.933105
CLF 0.03714
CLP 1024.7943
CNY 7.590121
CNH 7.588128
COP 4600.137266
CRC 533.643681
CUC 1.047927
CUP 27.770064
CVE 110.897513
CZK 25.354598
DJF 186.564084
DKK 7.458169
DOP 63.140125
DZD 140.654233
EGP 51.730874
ERN 15.718904
ETB 128.254711
FJD 2.385029
FKP 0.827147
GBP 0.832195
GEL 2.871238
GGP 0.827147
GHS 16.552408
GIP 0.827147
GMD 74.40309
GNF 9030.506244
GTQ 8.087126
GYD 219.180112
HKD 8.156576
HNL 26.475002
HRK 7.475134
HTG 137.524382
HUF 411.442327
IDR 16707.675541
ILS 3.888244
IMP 0.827147
INR 88.48302
IQD 1372.427756
IRR 44091.525793
ISK 146.374379
JEP 0.827147
JMD 166.901939
JOD 0.743084
JPY 161.400652
KES 135.673827
KGS 90.645742
KHR 4218.058045
KMF 495.144769
KPW 943.133847
KRW 1471.823666
KWD 0.322605
KYD 0.87308
KZT 523.103565
LAK 23012.252297
LBP 93817.093604
LKR 304.919132
LRD 189.098539
LSL 18.905328
LTL 3.094256
LVL 0.633881
LYD 5.116181
MAD 10.539412
MDL 19.10899
MGA 4889.889894
MKD 61.882955
MMK 3403.625819
MNT 3560.855681
MOP 8.399809
MRU 41.685758
MUR 49.095582
MVR 16.200603
MWK 1816.66148
MXN 21.338895
MYR 4.68214
MZN 66.973076
NAD 18.905328
NGN 1778.018417
NIO 38.549872
NOK 11.531786
NPR 141.486983
NZD 1.787143
OMR 0.40329
PAB 1.047676
PEN 3.972658
PGK 4.218058
PHP 61.763748
PKR 290.932457
PLN 4.335792
PYG 8178.647597
QAR 3.820792
RON 5.009395
RSD 117.676176
RUB 108.684182
RWF 1430.15702
SAR 3.934367
SBD 8.785353
SCR 14.355505
SDG 630.325516
SEK 11.490398
SGD 1.407224
SHP 0.827147
SLE 23.819044
SLL 21974.508901
SOS 598.71482
SRD 37.195159
STD 21689.971872
SVC 9.167286
SYP 2632.947722
SZL 18.898791
THB 36.095812
TJS 11.157437
TMT 3.667744
TND 3.328384
TOP 2.454353
TRY 36.229795
TTD 7.115584
TWD 34.145125
TZS 2786.794716
UAH 43.342206
UGX 3871.079021
USD 1.047927
UYU 44.554118
UZS 13440.659923
VES 48.790577
VND 26637.254851
VUV 124.411992
WST 2.925383
XAF 659.719767
XAG 0.033387
XAU 0.000385
XCD 2.832075
XDR 0.796945
XOF 659.719767
XPF 119.331742
YER 261.90314
ZAR 18.881343
ZMK 9432.600526
ZMW 28.941068
ZWL 337.432047
  • RIO

    -0.2200

    62.35

    -0.35%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    13.27

    +1.73%

  • BTI

    0.4000

    37.38

    +1.07%

  • CMSC

    0.0320

    24.672

    +0.13%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    24.46

    +0.06%

  • BCC

    3.4200

    143.78

    +2.38%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    26.77

    +0.34%

  • NGG

    1.0296

    63.11

    +1.63%

  • RELX

    0.9900

    46.75

    +2.12%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%

  • BP

    0.2000

    29.72

    +0.67%

  • RBGPF

    59.2400

    59.24

    +100%

  • AZN

    1.3700

    65.63

    +2.09%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    33.96

    +0.77%

  • VOD

    0.1323

    8.73

    +1.52%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    6.79

    -0.15%

Texas judge briefly lifts abortion ban for medical emergencies

Texas judge briefly lifts abortion ban for medical emergencies

A court in Texas on Friday issued a temporary order siding with a group of women and doctors who brought a lawsuit challenging the state's abortion bans.

Text size:

The ruling was stayed hours later, however, after the Texas attorney general's office filed an appeal. Judge Jessica Mangrum's decision has been blocked until the lawsuit is decided on its merits in a trial slated to begin next March.

The case, which was filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, argued that the way medical exceptions are defined under Texas law is confusing, stoking fear among doctors and causing a "health crisis."

In her judgment, Mangrum wrote she agreed the women were "delayed or denied access to abortion care because of the widespread uncertainty regarding physicians' level of discretion under the medical exception to Texas's abortion bans."

She ordered that physicians cannot be prosecuted for exercising their "good faith judgment."

Instead, doctors should be allowed to determine what they felt constituted medical emergencies that would risk a woman's "life and/or health (including their fertility)," she said.

First Assistant Attorney General Brent Webster said in a statement that the state filed an appeal that "stays an activist Austin judge's attempt to override Texas abortion laws pending a ruling by the Texas Supreme Court."

The court in Austin heard harrowing testimony from the plaintiffs last month.

Amanda Zurawski, after whom the case is named, said she was denied an abortion despite her water breaking very early in her pregnancy, meaning a miscarriage was inevitable.

Zurawski said her doctor told her that she "couldn't intervene, because the baby's heart was still beating and inducing labor would have been considered an illegal abortion."

Zurawski went into life-threatening septic shock and the fetus was stillborn.

The suit is the first brought on behalf of women denied abortions since the US Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to the procedure just over a year ago.

Texas physicians found guilty of providing abortions face up to 99 years in prison, fines of up to $100,000 and the revocation of their medical license.

A state "trigger" ban went into effect when Roe v. Wade was overturned in June 2022, prohibiting abortions even in cases of rape or incest. Texas also has a law that allows private citizens to sue anyone who performs or aids an abortion.

The lawsuit asks the court to create a binding interpretation of the "medical emergency" exception in the law and argues physicians should be allowed to exercise "good faith" judgments on the qualifying conditions for an abortion, rather than leaving this to state lawmakers.

The Texas attorney general's office, on the other hand, says the measures sought by the complaint would effectively nullify its bans.

The medical exception proposed by the plaintiffs "would, by design, swallow the rule," its lawyers argued in their written response.

"It would, for example, permit abortions for pregnant females with medical conditions ranging from a headache to feelings of depression."

S.Mohideen--DT