Dubai Telegraph - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 3.847878
AFN 71.355775
ALL 98.683518
AMD 407.90528
ANG 1.887605
AOA 956.471645
ARS 1045.95529
AUD 1.603226
AWG 1.888324
AZN 1.781822
BAM 1.966431
BBD 2.114632
BDT 125.156641
BGN 1.966151
BHD 0.394734
BIF 3093.725774
BMD 1.047614
BND 1.411632
BOB 7.237126
BRL 6.077208
BSD 1.047362
BTN 88.402636
BWP 14.308356
BYN 3.42753
BYR 20533.229892
BZD 2.111113
CAD 1.462317
CDF 3007.698713
CHF 0.934451
CLF 0.037128
CLP 1024.488044
CNY 7.587893
CNH 7.587411
COP 4598.762534
CRC 533.484204
CUC 1.047614
CUP 27.761765
CVE 110.864372
CZK 25.355423
DJF 186.50833
DKK 7.465217
DOP 63.121256
DZD 140.612199
EGP 51.738619
ERN 15.714207
ETB 128.216383
FJD 2.384317
FKP 0.826899
GBP 0.833093
GEL 2.870782
GGP 0.826899
GHS 16.547461
GIP 0.826899
GMD 74.380234
GNF 9027.807516
GTQ 8.084709
GYD 219.114611
HKD 8.154522
HNL 26.46709
HRK 7.4729
HTG 137.483283
HUF 411.178923
IDR 16702.682523
ILS 3.88451
IMP 0.826899
INR 88.456578
IQD 1372.017612
IRR 44078.349107
ISK 146.33087
JEP 0.826899
JMD 166.852061
JOD 0.742864
JPY 161.438289
KES 135.633281
KGS 90.645526
KHR 4216.797496
KMF 495.000342
KPW 942.851996
KRW 1471.38375
KWD 0.322508
KYD 0.872819
KZT 522.947237
LAK 23005.375183
LBP 93789.056763
LKR 304.828008
LRD 189.042028
LSL 18.899678
LTL 3.093331
LVL 0.633691
LYD 5.114652
MAD 10.536263
MDL 19.103279
MGA 4888.428571
MKD 61.864461
MMK 3402.60866
MNT 3559.791534
MOP 8.397299
MRU 41.673301
MUR 49.080863
MVR 16.196605
MWK 1816.118578
MXN 21.342527
MYR 4.680756
MZN 66.953146
NAD 18.899678
NGN 1777.488252
NIO 38.538352
NOK 11.546605
NPR 141.4447
NZD 1.789386
OMR 0.40317
PAB 1.047362
PEN 3.971471
PGK 4.216797
PHP 61.745272
PKR 290.845514
PLN 4.335303
PYG 8176.203443
QAR 3.81965
RON 5.007898
RSD 117.641009
RUB 108.641335
RWF 1429.729623
SAR 3.933191
SBD 8.782728
SCR 14.351263
SDG 630.139998
SEK 11.502008
SGD 1.409512
SHP 0.826899
SLE 23.812353
SLL 21967.941912
SOS 598.535896
SRD 37.184018
STD 21683.489915
SVC 9.164547
SYP 2632.160877
SZL 18.893143
THB 36.239583
TJS 11.154103
TMT 3.666648
TND 3.327389
TOP 2.45362
TRY 36.218968
TTD 7.113458
TWD 34.134924
TZS 2785.961894
UAH 43.329253
UGX 3869.922166
USD 1.047614
UYU 44.540803
UZS 13436.643239
VES 48.775996
VND 26629.29442
VUV 124.374812
WST 2.924509
XAF 659.522612
XAG 0.033459
XAU 0.000386
XCD 2.831229
XDR 0.796707
XOF 659.522612
XPF 119.331742
YER 261.824842
ZAR 18.888413
ZMK 9429.782938
ZMW 28.932419
ZWL 337.331207
  • RELX

    0.9900

    46.75

    +2.12%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    13.27

    +1.73%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    33.96

    +0.77%

  • VOD

    0.1323

    8.73

    +1.52%

  • RIO

    -0.2200

    62.35

    -0.35%

  • NGG

    1.0296

    63.11

    +1.63%

  • CMSC

    0.0320

    24.672

    +0.13%

  • AZN

    1.3700

    65.63

    +2.09%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    26.77

    +0.34%

  • BCC

    3.4200

    143.78

    +2.38%

  • RBGPF

    59.2400

    59.24

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    6.79

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    24.46

    +0.06%

  • BP

    0.2000

    29.72

    +0.67%

  • BTI

    0.4000

    37.38

    +1.07%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

Y.Al-Shehhi--DT