Dubai Telegraph - Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

EUR -
AED 3.854833
AFN 70.842978
ALL 98.075677
AMD 407.604571
ANG 1.885958
AOA 957.143769
ARS 1057.093376
AUD 1.620899
AWG 1.891723
AZN 1.780812
BAM 1.94671
BBD 2.112785
BDT 125.046132
BGN 1.957086
BHD 0.395588
BIF 3038.30149
BMD 1.0495
BND 1.408994
BOB 7.231373
BRL 6.09738
BSD 1.046384
BTN 88.205468
BWP 14.276611
BYN 3.424545
BYR 20570.19316
BZD 2.109371
CAD 1.474657
CDF 3013.113308
CHF 0.929573
CLF 0.037178
CLP 1025.854536
CNY 7.611024
CNH 7.614136
COP 4620.946964
CRC 534.688137
CUC 1.0495
CUP 27.811741
CVE 110.905837
CZK 25.276517
DJF 186.51722
DKK 7.458647
DOP 63.497795
DZD 140.238373
EGP 52.086037
ERN 15.742495
ETB 129.560857
FJD 2.389133
FKP 0.828388
GBP 0.83452
GEL 2.865435
GGP 0.828388
GHS 16.474638
GIP 0.828388
GMD 74.514077
GNF 9057.182336
GTQ 8.076137
GYD 218.923625
HKD 8.167831
HNL 26.473615
HRK 7.486353
HTG 137.338083
HUF 410.810368
IDR 16706.460195
ILS 3.824209
IMP 0.828388
INR 88.513069
IQD 1375.369293
IRR 44170.817668
ISK 145.104175
JEP 0.828388
JMD 165.238465
JOD 0.744408
JPY 160.427543
KES 135.913134
KGS 91.122843
KHR 4250.473525
KMF 492.162793
KPW 944.549288
KRW 1464.372094
KWD 0.32291
KYD 0.872045
KZT 522.490418
LAK 23052.260115
LBP 93982.693723
LKR 304.721381
LRD 188.726248
LSL 18.933171
LTL 3.0989
LVL 0.634832
LYD 5.137341
MAD 10.530153
MDL 19.12407
MGA 4910.608977
MKD 61.565484
MMK 3408.733928
MNT 3566.199758
MOP 8.387994
MRU 41.890784
MUR 49.148227
MVR 16.214668
MWK 1821.931462
MXN 21.690641
MYR 4.677089
MZN 67.071194
NAD 18.932901
NGN 1776.036553
NIO 38.579727
NOK 11.69151
NPR 141.128351
NZD 1.797468
OMR 0.40405
PAB 1.046424
PEN 3.965272
PGK 4.166377
PHP 61.885324
PKR 291.498726
PLN 4.307694
PYG 8166.02661
QAR 3.820808
RON 4.97683
RSD 116.993003
RUB 110.720688
RWF 1438.864022
SAR 3.943084
SBD 8.805922
SCR 13.772279
SDG 631.27191
SEK 11.53176
SGD 1.411976
SHP 0.828388
SLE 23.826447
SLL 22007.487903
SOS 599.792459
SRD 37.157507
STD 21722.523845
SVC 9.156247
SYP 2636.899209
SZL 18.933076
THB 36.410294
TJS 11.181299
TMT 3.683744
TND 3.324028
TOP 2.458031
TRY 36.374397
TTD 7.114847
TWD 34.024847
TZS 2775.926352
UAH 43.478489
UGX 3876.934664
USD 1.0495
UYU 44.591791
UZS 13465.080764
VES 49.006494
VND 26673.033631
VUV 124.598708
WST 2.929774
XAF 652.920809
XAG 0.0345
XAU 0.000399
XCD 2.836325
XDR 0.800447
XOF 658.559065
XPF 119.331742
YER 262.296216
ZAR 19.09328
ZMK 9446.766437
ZMW 28.855542
ZWL 337.938459
  • RBGPF

    0.8100

    61

    +1.33%

  • SCS

    -0.1800

    13.54

    -1.33%

  • RIO

    -0.9500

    62.03

    -1.53%

  • RYCEF

    0.0300

    6.8

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    0.3800

    37.71

    +1.01%

  • CMSD

    -0.1500

    24.43

    -0.61%

  • RELX

    0.2400

    46.81

    +0.51%

  • NGG

    -0.4300

    62.83

    -0.68%

  • CMSC

    -0.1600

    24.57

    -0.65%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    34.02

    -0.38%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    8.86

    -0.56%

  • BCE

    -0.3900

    26.63

    -1.46%

  • BCC

    -4.0900

    148.41

    -2.76%

  • BP

    -0.3600

    28.96

    -1.24%

  • AZN

    -0.0400

    66.36

    -0.06%

  • JRI

    -0.1300

    13.24

    -0.98%

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling
Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling / Photo: Bertrand GUAY - AFP

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

The EU's top court said on Friday some international football rules regulating player transfers are contrary to the bloc's laws, in a landmark decision that could shake up the system.

Text size:

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) was called on to decide a long-running dispute between former French footballer Lassana Diarra and FIFA, over what happens when players unilaterally terminate their contract.

In a highly anticipated verdict, judges found that by restricting a footballers' ability to seek further employment, current FIFA rules hinder the EU's free movement and competition between clubs.

"The Court holds that all of those rules are contrary to EU law," it said.

The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the lucrative transfer market, allowing players to leave their club without fear of being legally trapped afterwards.

"In a way, the Lassana Diarra affair is the Bosman 2.0 affair," Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, said ahead of the judgement, predicting the "end" of the current system in case of a favourable verdict.

Dupont was also involved in the 1995 case of footballer Jean-Marc Bosman, which allowed players to move to another club at the end of their contract without a transfer fee being paid and also ended quotas on foreign players at clubs.

On Friday, he hailed the new ruling as "a total victory".

- Ten-year saga -

The Diarra saga goes back 10 years.

In August 2014, Lokomotiv terminated the midfielder's contract citing contractual breaches by the player. The Russian club also sought 20 million euros ($22m) compensation from Diarra.

Diarra, now 39, refused and requested that Lokomotiv pay him compensation.

He was eventually ordered to pay his former club 10 million euros by FIFA, a fine that was upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Diarra also received a backdated 15-month suspension.

According to FIFA regulations, if a player terminates his contract unilaterally and "without just cause", he must pay compensation which includes his remuneration and benefits until the end of his contract.

Additionally, a purchasing club could be held jointly liable for any compensation and, in certain cases, be banned from signing any new players for a given period.

National football associations are also forced to refuse to issue a certificate needed to complete a transfer while a dispute is pending.

As a result clubs were not rushing to recruit Diarra after he left Lokomotiv.

His lawyers argued the rules violated the EU's free movement of workers, and by limiting the ability of clubs to recruit, were contrary to the principle of free competition within the 27-nation bloc.

Diarra requested six million euros from FIFA, on the grounds that he was prevented from playing during most of the 2014-2015 season.

Belgian side Charleroi rescinded their contract offer, afraid of the possible legal and financial consequences.

- Considerable risk -

After several twists and turns, a Belgian court asked the CJEU its opinion on the matter.

On Friday, the CJEU found that the rules impede the free movement of players by "imposing considerable legal risks, unforeseeable and potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players and clubs wishing to employ them".

Although some restrictions could be justified to allow a certain degree of stability in the player rosters of football clubs, the rules in question went beyond "what is necessary to pursue that objective", it said.

Judges said the burden put on purchasing clubs had as object the restriction, and even prevention, of cross-border competition, and as such did "not appear to be indispensable or necessary".

The ruling throws the world of football transfers into uncertainty.

Smaller teams often rely on trading players to sustain their finances -- recruiting young prospects on the cheap to later sell them at a high price.

Clubs currently have no obligation to let players go before the end of their contract, which gives management power in transfer negotiations, a lever they seem to stand to lose.

Capped 34 times by France, Diarra also played for Chelsea, Arsenal, Portsmouth and Real Madrid before ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.

K.Al-Zaabi--DT