Dubai Telegraph - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

EUR -
AED 3.845874
AFN 70.674066
ALL 97.848497
AMD 406.661363
ANG 1.881594
AOA 954.929054
ARS 1054.672401
AUD 1.622423
AWG 1.887346
AZN 1.780922
BAM 1.942206
BBD 2.107896
BDT 124.756771
BGN 1.954476
BHD 0.39467
BIF 3031.270778
BMD 1.047071
BND 1.405734
BOB 7.214639
BRL 6.094064
BSD 1.043963
BTN 88.001358
BWP 14.243575
BYN 3.41662
BYR 20522.593176
BZD 2.10449
CAD 1.474271
CDF 3006.140949
CHF 0.929946
CLF 0.037093
CLP 1023.501392
CNY 7.593411
CNH 7.601689
COP 4611.018329
CRC 533.450854
CUC 1.047071
CUP 27.747384
CVE 110.413563
CZK 25.282471
DJF 186.085088
DKK 7.459015
DOP 63.241086
DZD 140.285547
EGP 51.9608
ERN 15.706066
ETB 129.260624
FJD 2.387951
FKP 0.826471
GBP 0.835092
GEL 2.85865
GGP 0.826471
GHS 16.438375
GIP 0.826471
GMD 74.34189
GNF 9036.223128
GTQ 8.057448
GYD 218.417029
HKD 8.149511
HNL 26.412373
HRK 7.469029
HTG 137.020279
HUF 410.878547
IDR 16672.826935
ILS 3.815359
IMP 0.826471
INR 88.270601
IQD 1372.186651
IRR 44068.606931
ISK 145.133954
JEP 0.826471
JMD 164.856098
JOD 0.742688
JPY 160.610139
KES 135.595163
KGS 90.888485
KHR 4240.638096
KMF 491.02418
KPW 942.363575
KRW 1463.344866
KWD 0.322236
KYD 0.870027
KZT 521.281361
LAK 22998.916606
LBP 93765.214756
LKR 304.016247
LRD 188.289578
LSL 18.888537
LTL 3.091729
LVL 0.633363
LYD 5.125386
MAD 10.50579
MDL 19.079816
MGA 4899.245644
MKD 61.542117
MMK 3400.846025
MNT 3557.947475
MOP 8.368584
MRU 41.793859
MUR 49.547263
MVR 16.177003
MWK 1817.715192
MXN 21.806271
MYR 4.66732
MZN 66.896979
NAD 18.888878
NGN 1771.926971
NIO 38.490247
NOK 11.71439
NPR 140.801776
NZD 1.798952
OMR 0.40313
PAB 1.044003
PEN 3.956097
PGK 4.156765
PHP 61.72273
PKR 290.823758
PLN 4.309902
PYG 8147.130203
QAR 3.811971
RON 4.976835
RSD 117.006008
RUB 110.457098
RWF 1435.534451
SAR 3.933975
SBD 8.785545
SCR 14.239048
SDG 629.812192
SEK 11.527981
SGD 1.411719
SHP 0.826471
SLE 23.766152
SLL 21956.56198
SOS 598.400886
SRD 37.071596
STD 21672.257337
SVC 9.13506
SYP 2630.797353
SZL 18.889327
THB 36.375347
TJS 11.155425
TMT 3.675219
TND 3.316336
TOP 2.452339
TRY 36.279133
TTD 7.098383
TWD 34.02405
TZS 2769.502683
UAH 43.377879
UGX 3867.963333
USD 1.047071
UYU 44.488604
UZS 13433.921708
VES 48.773334
VND 26611.311509
VUV 124.310383
WST 2.922994
XAF 651.409933
XAG 0.034443
XAU 0.000399
XCD 2.829762
XDR 0.798595
XOF 657.034899
XPF 119.331742
YER 261.68926
ZAR 19.065697
ZMK 9424.903205
ZMW 28.788769
ZWL 337.156461
  • RBGPF

    0.8100

    61

    +1.33%

  • RYCEF

    0.0300

    6.8

    +0.44%

  • CMSC

    -0.1700

    24.56

    -0.69%

  • SCS

    -0.1590

    13.561

    -1.17%

  • RIO

    -1.1350

    61.845

    -1.84%

  • NGG

    -0.4700

    62.79

    -0.75%

  • AZN

    -0.2550

    66.145

    -0.39%

  • RELX

    0.1600

    46.73

    +0.34%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    8.87

    -0.45%

  • BCC

    -4.0450

    148.455

    -2.72%

  • JRI

    -0.0600

    13.31

    -0.45%

  • GSK

    -0.2340

    33.916

    -0.69%

  • BCE

    -0.3900

    26.63

    -1.46%

  • BTI

    0.2050

    37.535

    +0.55%

  • CMSD

    -0.1800

    24.4

    -0.74%

  • BP

    -0.4600

    28.86

    -1.59%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

A.El-Sewedy--DT