Dubai Telegraph - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

EUR -
AED 3.981396
AFN 77.041256
ALL 99.343307
AMD 425.750294
ANG 1.956468
AOA 988.655278
ARS 1156.016649
AUD 1.723864
AWG 1.951294
AZN 1.841055
BAM 1.952714
BBD 2.191862
BDT 131.70067
BGN 1.955596
BHD 0.40855
BIF 3216.420129
BMD 1.084052
BND 1.450229
BOB 7.490233
BRL 6.288047
BSD 1.085627
BTN 94.338795
BWP 14.870998
BYN 3.552677
BYR 21247.418601
BZD 2.180563
CAD 1.564742
CDF 3117.733675
CHF 0.958623
CLF 0.026504
CLP 1017.061812
CNY 7.846206
CNH 7.854531
COP 4471.714374
CRC 542.243462
CUC 1.084052
CUP 28.727377
CVE 110.092047
CZK 25.038339
DJF 193.317868
DKK 7.460841
DOP 68.022907
DZD 144.704671
EGP 54.904411
ERN 16.26078
ETB 142.620129
FJD 2.491587
FKP 0.836044
GBP 0.837593
GEL 3.008237
GGP 0.836044
GHS 16.801605
GIP 0.836044
GMD 78.051539
GNF 9387.501617
GTQ 8.356718
GYD 226.773742
HKD 8.426439
HNL 27.762105
HRK 7.535896
HTG 142.36253
HUF 399.884518
IDR 17772.273203
ILS 3.971403
IMP 0.836044
INR 94.269538
IQD 1422.123872
IRR 45638.588218
ISK 146.108401
JEP 0.836044
JMD 171.256093
JOD 0.768813
JPY 160.783876
KES 140.330444
KGS 94.80037
KHR 4350.466128
KMF 489.829113
KPW 975.685077
KRW 1578.205923
KWD 0.334062
KYD 0.904652
KZT 541.031038
LAK 23505.741711
LBP 97268.095863
LKR 320.632836
LRD 216.789427
LSL 19.967631
LTL 3.200924
LVL 0.655732
LYD 5.226648
MAD 10.514482
MDL 19.312966
MGA 5079.657793
MKD 61.557542
MMK 2275.301197
MNT 3761.762822
MOP 8.690435
MRU 43.130503
MUR 48.782102
MVR 16.70549
MWK 1882.373188
MXN 21.795622
MYR 4.81863
MZN 69.243049
NAD 19.967631
NGN 1685.548933
NIO 39.944361
NOK 11.59522
NPR 151.163239
NZD 1.89979
OMR 0.417375
PAB 1.083987
PEN 3.975287
PGK 4.383543
PHP 62.043527
PKR 303.961523
PLN 4.183277
PYG 8602.460146
QAR 3.950657
RON 4.977427
RSD 117.109033
RUB 93.499939
RWF 1545.295896
SAR 4.065789
SBD 9.118122
SCR 15.569701
SDG 651.515186
SEK 11.07022
SGD 1.448667
SHP 0.851895
SLE 24.74857
SLL 22732.028947
SOS 620.358208
SRD 39.313686
STD 22437.687075
SVC 9.498492
SYP 14094.849238
SZL 19.960655
THB 36.522058
TJS 11.815039
TMT 3.805022
TND 3.347111
TOP 2.538956
TRY 39.768246
TTD 7.373605
TWD 35.755397
TZS 2867.317434
UAH 45.075963
UGX 3970.707132
USD 1.084052
UYU 45.986907
UZS 14045.248142
VES 70.15884
VND 27671.510572
VUV 133.769786
WST 3.071584
XAF 655.912812
XAG 0.032052
XAU 0.000363
XCD 2.929705
XDR 0.815745
XOF 655.912812
XPF 119.331742
YER 267.489676
ZAR 19.859236
ZMK 9757.770278
ZMW 31.042052
ZWL 349.064292
  • NGG

    0.0600

    62.32

    +0.1%

  • BCC

    -1.8300

    96.38

    -1.9%

  • CMSC

    0.1100

    23.17

    +0.47%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    23.2

    -0.04%

  • AZN

    0.9400

    76.51

    +1.23%

  • SCS

    -0.2900

    10.79

    -2.69%

  • RIO

    0.4200

    61.2

    +0.69%

  • BP

    0.1700

    32.37

    +0.53%

  • BTI

    0.0200

    41.38

    +0.05%

  • GSK

    0.3500

    39.23

    +0.89%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.93

    0%

  • RBGPF

    66.2000

    66.2

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    0.2700

    10.05

    +2.69%

  • VOD

    0.3400

    9.5

    +3.58%

  • RELX

    0.0800

    47.81

    +0.17%

  • BCE

    0.0100

    24.36

    +0.04%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

A.El-Sewedy--DT