Dubai Telegraph - US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'

EUR -
AED 3.864558
AFN 70.494102
ALL 97.271059
AMD 407.155517
ANG 1.896104
AOA 960.613091
ARS 1056.248038
AUD 1.631278
AWG 1.8965
AZN 1.791206
BAM 1.954184
BBD 2.124143
BDT 125.716025
BGN 1.949289
BHD 0.396502
BIF 3048.60406
BMD 1.05215
BND 1.415816
BOB 7.269126
BRL 6.090159
BSD 1.05203
BTN 88.793862
BWP 14.440919
BYN 3.442853
BYR 20622.13618
BZD 2.120586
CAD 1.47947
CDF 3015.461382
CHF 0.937518
CLF 0.037193
CLP 1026.277825
CNY 7.607358
CNH 7.633568
COP 4716.787576
CRC 537.355573
CUC 1.05215
CUP 27.88197
CVE 110.363712
CZK 25.291264
DJF 186.988154
DKK 7.458676
DOP 63.602651
DZD 140.588561
EGP 52.233238
ERN 15.782247
ETB 128.283337
FJD 2.393671
FKP 0.83048
GBP 0.831162
GEL 2.867092
GGP 0.83048
GHS 16.887178
GIP 0.83048
GMD 74.702778
GNF 9081.104686
GTQ 8.124589
GYD 220.093785
HKD 8.187341
HNL 26.387556
HRK 7.505257
HTG 138.234358
HUF 406.601144
IDR 16790.574842
ILS 3.937918
IMP 0.83048
INR 88.885401
IQD 1378.84232
IRR 44300.767226
ISK 145.690973
JEP 0.83048
JMD 166.542259
JOD 0.746077
JPY 164.475189
KES 136.255597
KGS 90.881018
KHR 4262.25889
KMF 490.83124
KPW 946.934426
KRW 1480.916654
KWD 0.323452
KYD 0.876658
KZT 521.56863
LAK 23089.427195
LBP 94272.622526
LKR 307.355797
LRD 193.70505
LSL 19.147959
LTL 3.106725
LVL 0.636435
LYD 5.134208
MAD 10.492567
MDL 19.056877
MGA 4903.018084
MKD 61.274857
MMK 3417.341525
MNT 3575.204981
MOP 8.433465
MRU 42.049169
MUR 49.650906
MVR 16.266333
MWK 1825.479971
MXN 21.508788
MYR 4.715726
MZN 67.179687
NAD 19.147075
NGN 1767.569779
NIO 38.677193
NOK 11.743833
NPR 142.075896
NZD 1.79987
OMR 0.4051
PAB 1.05205
PEN 4.002903
PGK 4.147838
PHP 61.975307
PKR 292.604659
PLN 4.320964
PYG 8216.204675
QAR 3.830614
RON 4.9753
RSD 116.403513
RUB 104.831166
RWF 1439.340933
SAR 3.951908
SBD 8.820576
SCR 15.513945
SDG 632.870058
SEK 11.582286
SGD 1.41671
SHP 0.83048
SLE 23.881015
SLL 22063.060321
SOS 601.301259
SRD 37.200331
STD 21777.376683
SVC 9.205387
SYP 2643.557801
SZL 19.154703
THB 36.838902
TJS 11.214312
TMT 3.682524
TND 3.316347
TOP 2.464243
TRY 36.140494
TTD 7.143092
TWD 34.320603
TZS 2798.718783
UAH 43.369431
UGX 3860.806867
USD 1.05215
UYU 44.693036
UZS 13467.517223
VES 47.823448
VND 26724.605049
VUV 124.913339
WST 2.937172
XAF 655.402482
XAG 0.034478
XAU 0.00041
XCD 2.843488
XDR 0.792537
XOF 652.851937
XPF 119.331742
YER 262.879515
ZAR 19.237481
ZMK 9470.611478
ZMW 28.851686
ZWL 338.791808
  • RBGPF

    -0.9400

    59.25

    -1.59%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    24.55

    -0.24%

  • BCC

    -2.2000

    140.35

    -1.57%

  • SCS

    -0.1000

    13.27

    -0.75%

  • GSK

    -0.7200

    34.39

    -2.09%

  • RELX

    -0.1700

    45.95

    -0.37%

  • NGG

    0.2500

    62.37

    +0.4%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3200

    6.79

    -4.71%

  • CMSD

    -0.0050

    24.725

    -0.02%

  • BTI

    0.0700

    35.49

    +0.2%

  • RIO

    -0.1900

    60.43

    -0.31%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.21

    -0.23%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    8.68

    -0.81%

  • BCE

    -0.3700

    26.84

    -1.38%

  • BP

    0.4800

    29.05

    +1.65%

  • AZN

    -0.2500

    65.04

    -0.38%

US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'
US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt' / Photo: Bastien INZAURRALDE - AFP

US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'

Understanding disinformation has emerged as a lightning rod in the United States ahead of the November election, with academics and think-tanks facing lawsuits by right-wing groups and subpoenas from a Republican-led congressional committee.

Text size:

The researchers are accused of colluding with the government to censor conservative speech online under the guise of fighting disinformation. They deny the claims and denounce the sweeping offensive as an intimidation campaign.

AFP spoke with Renee DiResta, author of "Invisible Rulers: The people who turn lies into reality."

She was formerly with the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), a non-partisan disinformation research project.

Following the Republican-led investigation, her contract, along with those of many other staffers, was not renewed, leading to reports that the group was being dismantled under political pressure.

The interview was edited for length and clarity.

QUESTION:

What pressure did the Stanford Observatory face?

ANSWER:

We received a letter and then a subpoena from Jim Jordan, who heads a (Republican-led) committee that asked us for our emails with the executive branch of the United States and with tech platforms.

It was a very broad request ostensibly to investigate whether there had been some sort of cabal by which the government was telling us to tell tech platforms to take information or content down. That never happened.

We turned over copious amounts of material, several colleagues who had worked on this project sat for multi hour private interviews with the committee.

There was nothing found to bolster their theory, but it created extensive costs in terms of time and lawyer costs. Students were targeted, doxxed and harassed.

Ultimately, Stanford made the determination to not continue to pursue rapid response election research and many of our contracts weren't renewed for funding reasons.

QUESTION:

What impact has this had on election disinformation research?

ANSWER:

There has been a chilling effect. This idea that inquiries from congressional committees are shutting down research or making students afraid to pursue them because they're afraid of being harassed is remarkable.

We are one institution among many. I saw a statistic that something like 91 subpoenas had gone out from this committee. It's just an incredible witch hunt and the cost of that is that less resourced institutions may choose to not fight, to just comply as quickly as possible.

There has been a sense that doing work on certain topics is going to attract unwanted attention, and so you shouldn't do work on those topics. That's terrible. Academia is supposed to be about asking hard questions, doing complicated research, doing things that perhaps industry might not want to take on, or that government is not positioned to take.

QUESTION:

How do you deal with personal attacks? You have been branded “CIA Renee” by trolls insinuating that you have secret ties with the US intelligence agency.

ANSWER:

I've dealt with idiots on the internet for a decade now. People have their opinions.

I am not troubled by the harassment of the trolls online. I'm troubled by the fact that the United States government (through the congressional committee) is facilitating it at this point with misleading investigations, misleading reports, cherry picked sentences, leaked documents and badly framed stories that bear no relation to the truth.

That I think is the problem that we need to be focusing on. That is an affront to free speech.

QUESTION:

Many tech platforms have scaled back content moderation. Are they equipped to tackle the flood of election disinformation?

ANSWER:

There's this belief that if you just label something or take it down, you solve the problem. You don't.

We can debate the areas where the platforms are not doing enough, because there certainly are some. But you also can't solve a human problem with technology. People are going to share rumors.

To address disinformation, platforms have traditionally appended a label, a fact check perhaps (but) it's not clear how well the labels work.

One of the things that we've seen is that we need more proactive content participation from the institutions. We need election officials out there proactively countering rumors.

G.Gopinath--DT