Dubai Telegraph - Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

EUR -
AED 4.003446
AFN 77.037415
ALL 99.587944
AMD 427.199572
ANG 1.966642
AOA 994.130181
ARS 1162.166813
AUD 1.716357
AWG 1.962099
AZN 1.854698
BAM 1.958549
BBD 2.203252
BDT 132.586084
BGN 1.951705
BHD 0.410747
BIF 3233.337967
BMD 1.090055
BND 1.456444
BOB 7.540583
BRL 6.238496
BSD 1.091211
BTN 94.84925
BWP 14.866592
BYN 3.571112
BYR 21365.075732
BZD 2.191856
CAD 1.563558
CDF 3134.998465
CHF 0.96163
CLF 0.0264
CLP 1013.074893
CNY 7.889654
CNH 7.883157
COP 4502.613407
CRC 545.160127
CUC 1.090055
CUP 28.886454
CVE 110.419974
CZK 25.008037
DJF 194.309146
DKK 7.460499
DOP 68.615672
DZD 145.577144
EGP 55.048103
ERN 16.350823
ETB 143.325441
FJD 2.490503
FKP 0.842402
GBP 0.840318
GEL 3.024868
GGP 0.842402
GHS 16.833312
GIP 0.842402
GMD 77.929382
GNF 9463.33532
GTQ 8.398146
GYD 227.803893
HKD 8.469874
HNL 27.942204
HRK 7.533481
HTG 145.067735
HUF 399.786134
IDR 17838.915278
ILS 3.992713
IMP 0.842402
INR 94.779458
IQD 1428.377249
IRR 45785.156765
ISK 146.060474
JEP 0.842402
JMD 170.605817
JOD 0.772815
JPY 161.776681
KES 141.383322
KGS 95.32531
KHR 4361.083771
KMF 492.88673
KPW 981.049396
KRW 1582.256463
KWD 0.335826
KYD 0.89385
KZT 547.071005
LAK 23625.628066
LBP 98508.735249
LKR 321.930417
LRD 217.102082
LSL 19.803691
LTL 3.218649
LVL 0.659363
LYD 5.246217
MAD 10.559648
MDL 19.370294
MGA 5095.713924
MKD 61.446405
MMK 2289.097873
MNT 3785.195861
MOP 8.727114
MRU 43.521669
MUR 49.007393
MVR 16.852249
MWK 1889.423202
MXN 21.71046
MYR 4.846495
MZN 69.370451
NAD 19.803691
NGN 1687.102964
NIO 39.922615
NOK 11.526126
NPR 151.718217
NZD 1.883057
OMR 0.419664
PAB 1.090055
PEN 3.987757
PGK 4.427489
PHP 62.417049
PKR 305.313897
PLN 4.17363
PYG 8709.905691
QAR 3.967739
RON 4.98443
RSD 117.425295
RUB 93.199411
RWF 1531.284514
SAR 4.088087
SBD 9.265237
SCR 16.266028
SDG 652.902124
SEK 11.029104
SGD 1.453802
SHP 0.856612
SLE 24.885853
SLL 22857.907076
SOS 623.282191
SRD 39.590766
STD 22561.935292
SVC 9.537771
SYP 14172.828943
SZL 19.803691
THB 36.558532
TJS 11.92236
TMT 3.815387
TND 3.355165
TOP 2.620294
TRY 39.972759
TTD 7.421989
TWD 35.941679
TZS 2866.79274
UAH 45.371694
UGX 3995.675628
USD 1.090055
UYU 46.423637
UZS 14103.297353
VES 72.243931
VND 27801.848738
VUV 134.03035
WST 3.072315
XAF 657.182306
XAG 0.032314
XAU 0.000364
XCD 2.943148
XDR 0.818059
XOF 657.182306
XPF 119.331742
YER 270.861563
ZAR 19.765873
ZMK 9811.80347
ZMW 31.320798
ZWL 350.997228
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.22

    +0.22%

  • CMSD

    0.1500

    23.35

    +0.64%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.4

    +0.48%

  • SCS

    0.2000

    10.99

    +1.82%

  • BCE

    -0.1990

    23.47

    -0.85%

  • NGG

    0.8900

    63.21

    +1.41%

  • BCC

    2.9700

    99.35

    +2.99%

  • RBGPF

    66.0200

    66.02

    +100%

  • JRI

    0.0335

    12.83

    +0.26%

  • RIO

    1.8400

    63.04

    +2.92%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    9.55

    +0.52%

  • BP

    1.0200

    33.39

    +3.05%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    39.49

    +0.66%

  • AZN

    1.0900

    77.6

    +1.4%

  • RELX

    1.1200

    48.93

    +2.29%

  • BTI

    -0.0200

    41.36

    -0.05%

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant
Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant / Photo: Luka GONZALES - AFP

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

A Peruvian farmer faces off in a German court Monday in a "David and Goliath" battle against an energy giant, demanding the firm pay for climate change damage.

Text size:

Saul Luciano Lliuya, 44, argues that electricity producer RWE -- one of the world's top emitters of climate-altering carbon dioxide -- must share the cost of protecting his hometown Huaraz from a swollen glacier lake at risk of overflowing from melting snow and ice.

He wants the German company to pay 17,000 euros ($18,400) towards flood defences for his community, arguing that the fossil fuels the firm uses to generate electricity make it partly responsible for the flood risk.

"What I am asking is for the company to take responsibility for part of the construction costs," he said at a press conference in Lima earlier this month.

"I have full confidence in these processes."

However much confidence Lliuya has in proceedings, they have moved at a glacial pace.

He first filed a lawsuit in 2015 but a court in the western German city of Essen, where RWE is headquartered, dismissed it the following year.

However, in 2017 a higher court in the city of Hamm, also in western Germany, allowed an appeal.

After a delay due to the Covid pandemic, hearings are scheduled from Monday to Wednesday, and Lliuya will be attending.

"I would never have thought that it would all take so long," Lliuya told Germanwatch, a German environmental NGO supporting him in the case.

- 'Fair contribution' -

The hearing will ask if Lliuya's property in Peru's Ancash region is at substantial risk of flooding, examining evidence collected by court-appointed experts who travelled to the area in 2022.

If confirmed, a subsequent hearing would look at the question of RWE's responsibility.

Lliuya bases his claim on a 2014 study that concluded RWE was responsible for 0.47 percent of all global carbon emissions since the start of the industrial era.

RWE, which has never operated in Peru, should pay that share of the 3.5 million euros it would cost to lower the waters of Lake Palcacocha, he says.

Founded in 1898, RWE power plants today use a variety of power sources including solar, wind, gas and coal.

"It is time for companies like RWE to make a fair contribution to the costs of the damage they have helped to cause," said Francesca Mascha Klein, legal officer at Germanwatch.

RWE says a court ruling in favour of Lliuya would set a precedent of holding people responsible under German law for actions that have environmental consequences far outside the country.

"We think that is legally inadmissible and the wrong way to address this issue socially and politically," a spokesman said.

Dismissing the case in 2015, the Essen court said that it was impossible to draw a link between particular emissions and particular damage.

The Hamm hearing might be the first stage towards overturning that opinion at a time when 43 climate-damage cases are ongoing worldwide, according to Zero Carbon Analytics, a not-for-profit research group.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, the law firm representing RWE, says that there could be major implications: "The sum in dispute may be less than 20,000 euros. But the precedent-setting potential is clear."

R.El-Zarouni--DT