Dubai Telegraph - Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

EUR -
AED 3.994578
AFN 76.887936
ALL 99.397449
AMD 426.374576
ANG 1.962862
AOA 991.94594
ARS 1162.092983
AUD 1.718698
AWG 1.957788
AZN 1.851598
BAM 1.954767
BBD 2.199037
BDT 132.330037
BGN 1.947592
BHD 0.410579
BIF 3227.034527
BMD 1.08766
BND 1.453605
BOB 7.526021
BRL 6.246651
BSD 1.089124
BTN 94.66695
BWP 14.838155
BYN 3.564216
BYR 21318.135098
BZD 2.187643
CAD 1.563702
CDF 3128.110153
CHF 0.96191
CLF 0.026406
CLP 1013.329231
CNY 7.87232
CNH 7.875387
COP 4492.720836
CRC 544.107328
CUC 1.08766
CUP 28.822989
CVE 110.206734
CZK 25.020513
DJF 193.937465
DKK 7.460868
DOP 68.483163
DZD 145.3155
EGP 54.991797
ERN 16.314899
ETB 143.048655
FJD 2.491832
FKP 0.840551
GBP 0.84106
GEL 3.018242
GGP 0.840551
GHS 16.881075
GIP 0.840551
GMD 78.311523
GNF 9417.847606
GTQ 8.396561
GYD 227.859531
HKD 8.452091
HNL 27.853018
HRK 7.532476
HTG 142.833171
HUF 399.619345
IDR 17809.887917
ILS 3.980289
IMP 0.840551
INR 94.415356
IQD 1426.745679
IRR 45790.484347
ISK 146.311934
JEP 0.840551
JMD 170.559825
JOD 0.771147
JPY 162.15324
KES 140.854207
KGS 95.115857
KHR 4363.652816
KMF 491.459541
KPW 978.893959
KRW 1574.279305
KWD 0.335075
KYD 0.90762
KZT 545.831419
LAK 23592.526627
LBP 97583.307688
LKR 322.809331
LRD 217.814841
LSL 19.815723
LTL 3.211577
LVL 0.657915
LYD 5.243228
MAD 10.540527
MDL 19.380753
MGA 5078.315094
MKD 61.497486
MMK 2284.068557
MNT 3776.879509
MOP 8.71869
MRU 43.27972
MUR 48.999147
MVR 16.760355
MWK 1888.501549
MXN 21.675301
MYR 4.837367
MZN 69.514472
NAD 19.815723
NGN 1677.661475
NIO 40.078074
NOK 11.5764
NPR 151.465528
NZD 1.88877
OMR 0.418799
PAB 1.089124
PEN 3.995188
PGK 4.476551
PHP 62.257793
PKR 305.083902
PLN 4.187084
PYG 8647.428103
QAR 3.969501
RON 4.976805
RSD 117.148064
RUB 93.003844
RWF 1529.891146
SAR 4.079271
SBD 9.14847
SCR 15.63732
SDG 653.682971
SEK 11.029835
SGD 1.451449
SHP 0.85473
SLE 24.831398
SLL 22807.686583
SOS 622.4709
SRD 39.502716
STD 22512.365071
SVC 9.529962
SYP 14141.690202
SZL 19.82252
THB 36.605198
TJS 11.871224
TMT 3.817686
TND 3.364821
TOP 2.547411
TRY 39.901349
TTD 7.39509
TWD 35.904197
TZS 2886.914936
UAH 45.178514
UGX 3991.889487
USD 1.08766
UYU 46.41546
UZS 14107.54134
VES 69.726055
VND 27773.396925
VUV 133.735875
WST 3.065565
XAF 655.610379
XAG 0.032185
XAU 0.000364
XCD 2.939456
XDR 0.815369
XOF 655.610379
XPF 119.331742
YER 268.380589
ZAR 19.831081
ZMK 9790.240117
ZMW 31.175517
ZWL 350.226061
  • RBGPF

    66.0200

    66.02

    +100%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.22

    +0.22%

  • RIO

    1.8400

    63.04

    +2.92%

  • SCS

    0.2000

    10.99

    +1.82%

  • NGG

    0.8900

    63.21

    +1.41%

  • CMSD

    0.1500

    23.35

    +0.64%

  • RELX

    1.1200

    48.93

    +2.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.4

    +0.48%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    39.49

    +0.66%

  • AZN

    1.0900

    77.6

    +1.4%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    9.55

    +0.52%

  • BTI

    -0.0200

    41.36

    -0.05%

  • BCE

    -0.1990

    23.47

    -0.85%

  • JRI

    0.0335

    12.83

    +0.26%

  • BP

    1.0200

    33.39

    +3.05%

  • BCC

    2.9700

    99.35

    +2.99%

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant
Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant / Photo: Luka GONZALES - AFP

Peru farmer in German court battle with energy giant

A Peruvian farmer faces off in a German court Monday in a "David and Goliath" battle against an energy giant, demanding the firm pay for climate change damage.

Text size:

Saul Luciano Lliuya, 44, argues that electricity producer RWE -- one of the world's top emitters of climate-altering carbon dioxide -- must share the cost of protecting his hometown Huaraz from a swollen glacier lake at risk of overflowing from melting snow and ice.

He wants the German company to pay 17,000 euros ($18,400) towards flood defences for his community, arguing that the fossil fuels the firm uses to generate electricity make it partly responsible for the flood risk.

"What I am asking is for the company to take responsibility for part of the construction costs," he said at a press conference in Lima earlier this month.

"I have full confidence in these processes."

However much confidence Lliuya has in proceedings, they have moved at a glacial pace.

He first filed a lawsuit in 2015 but a court in the western German city of Essen, where RWE is headquartered, dismissed it the following year.

However, in 2017 a higher court in the city of Hamm, also in western Germany, allowed an appeal.

After a delay due to the Covid pandemic, hearings are scheduled from Monday to Wednesday, and Lliuya will be attending.

"I would never have thought that it would all take so long," Lliuya told Germanwatch, a German environmental NGO supporting him in the case.

- 'Fair contribution' -

The hearing will ask if Lliuya's property in Peru's Ancash region is at substantial risk of flooding, examining evidence collected by court-appointed experts who travelled to the area in 2022.

If confirmed, a subsequent hearing would look at the question of RWE's responsibility.

Lliuya bases his claim on a 2014 study that concluded RWE was responsible for 0.47 percent of all global carbon emissions since the start of the industrial era.

RWE, which has never operated in Peru, should pay that share of the 3.5 million euros it would cost to lower the waters of Lake Palcacocha, he says.

Founded in 1898, RWE power plants today use a variety of power sources including solar, wind, gas and coal.

"It is time for companies like RWE to make a fair contribution to the costs of the damage they have helped to cause," said Francesca Mascha Klein, legal officer at Germanwatch.

RWE says a court ruling in favour of Lliuya would set a precedent of holding people responsible under German law for actions that have environmental consequences far outside the country.

"We think that is legally inadmissible and the wrong way to address this issue socially and politically," a spokesman said.

Dismissing the case in 2015, the Essen court said that it was impossible to draw a link between particular emissions and particular damage.

The Hamm hearing might be the first stage towards overturning that opinion at a time when 43 climate-damage cases are ongoing worldwide, according to Zero Carbon Analytics, a not-for-profit research group.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, the law firm representing RWE, says that there could be major implications: "The sum in dispute may be less than 20,000 euros. But the precedent-setting potential is clear."

R.El-Zarouni--DT