Dubai Telegraph - Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk

EUR -
AED 3.784692
AFN 73.198448
ALL 97.52768
AMD 411.285686
ANG 1.854032
AOA 941.270843
ARS 1067.244138
AUD 1.66332
AWG 1.854724
AZN 1.72798
BAM 1.953832
BBD 2.077108
BDT 124.994086
BGN 1.953502
BHD 0.388397
BIF 3042.834761
BMD 1.030402
BND 1.408481
BOB 7.108839
BRL 6.292252
BSD 1.028864
BTN 88.33002
BWP 14.418475
BYN 3.366609
BYR 20195.879422
BZD 2.066418
CAD 1.481383
CDF 2957.253758
CHF 0.938904
CLF 0.037393
CLP 1031.783021
CNY 7.554497
CNH 7.574521
COP 4457.519101
CRC 521.574585
CUC 1.030402
CUP 27.305653
CVE 110.154035
CZK 25.121922
DJF 183.195456
DKK 7.461486
DOP 62.95658
DZD 140.004901
EGP 52.138962
ERN 15.45603
ETB 129.624747
FJD 2.40027
FKP 0.81606
GBP 0.835966
GEL 2.859392
GGP 0.81606
GHS 15.142746
GIP 0.81606
GMD 73.158381
GNF 8892.093166
GTQ 7.939003
GYD 215.153263
HKD 8.016476
HNL 26.223978
HRK 7.390977
HTG 134.214797
HUF 414.468889
IDR 16716.21183
ILS 3.774349
IMP 0.81606
INR 88.54126
IQD 1349.826635
IRR 43379.924605
ISK 145.039346
JEP 0.81606
JMD 161.107706
JOD 0.73097
JPY 162.914286
KES 133.1799
KGS 89.644981
KHR 4157.811575
KMF 492.023583
KPW 927.361234
KRW 1504.891776
KWD 0.317735
KYD 0.857336
KZT 541.854156
LAK 22475.647466
LBP 92324.020464
LKR 304.503255
LRD 192.942625
LSL 19.412744
LTL 3.042509
LVL 0.62328
LYD 5.074723
MAD 10.351931
MDL 18.97988
MGA 4842.889646
MKD 61.500649
MMK 3346.705539
MNT 3501.3059
MOP 8.242996
MRU 41.035755
MUR 48.2738
MVR 15.878359
MWK 1785.207737
MXN 21.062489
MYR 4.637838
MZN 65.853311
NAD 19.412744
NGN 1590.600421
NIO 37.826339
NOK 11.776341
NPR 141.327632
NZD 1.841334
OMR 0.396673
PAB 1.028864
PEN 3.889798
PGK 4.133461
PHP 60.226922
PKR 287.169787
PLN 4.276699
PYG 8141.798255
QAR 3.751177
RON 4.972824
RSD 117.065002
RUB 107.677565
RWF 1427.106786
SAR 3.86768
SBD 8.688662
SCR 15.214057
SDG 619.271538
SEK 11.514232
SGD 1.410981
SHP 0.81606
SLE 23.492236
SLL 21607.018098
SOS 588.872975
SRD 36.167628
STD 21327.241261
SVC 9.001932
SYP 2588.916216
SZL 19.400457
THB 35.744699
TJS 11.254363
TMT 3.606407
TND 3.314287
TOP 2.413305
TRY 36.442947
TTD 6.976972
TWD 33.944569
TZS 2565.700859
UAH 43.510469
UGX 3810.161785
USD 1.030402
UYU 45.244422
UZS 13384.922259
VES 54.833835
VND 26156.755058
VUV 122.33139
WST 2.846782
XAF 655.296878
XAG 0.034189
XAU 0.000387
XCD 2.784713
XDR 0.792202
XOF 653.27507
XPF 119.331742
YER 256.73226
ZAR 19.513235
ZMK 9274.855421
ZMW 28.779009
ZWL 331.789027
  • BCC

    -0.8200

    117.4

    -0.7%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    66.58

    -0.09%

  • GSK

    -0.3400

    33.75

    -1.01%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    23.63

    -0.97%

  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    23.1

    -0.56%

  • BTI

    -0.0400

    36.74

    -0.11%

  • RYCEF

    7.2200

    7.22

    +100%

  • SCS

    0.1000

    11.3

    +0.88%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.4

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.6200

    57.98

    -1.07%

  • RIO

    0.4400

    58.63

    +0.75%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.22

    0%

  • RBGPF

    59.3100

    59.31

    +100%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    46.77

    +1.69%

  • VOD

    -0.2000

    8.21

    -2.44%

  • BP

    -0.7100

    31.12

    -2.28%

Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk
Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk / Photo: Ronan LIETAR - AFP/File

Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk

It is still not clear what exactly fell onto a Kenyan village last month, but such events are likely to become increasingly common given the amount of space debris drifting above the planet.

Text size:

- What we know

A metallic ring of roughly 2.5 metres (8 feet) in diameter and weighing some 500 kilogrammes (1,100 pounds), crashed into Mukuku village, in Makueni county, in the south of the country on December 30.

The Kenya Space Agency (KSA) has opened an investigation and is examining the possibility that it might have been the separation ring from a rocket.

Other theories have already surfaced however, and a KSA spokesman has said they have not ruled out anything.

- The theories being examined

It is not even certain that what crashed in Kenya came from outer space.

But for Romain Lucken who runs Aldoria, a French start-up that tracks debris in space, it is "absolutely plausible" that it did.

He said he thought it might be part of the upper stage of a Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) developed by India's space agency.

"There is a mission that was sent up on December 30 with a return date that fits well, and most of all, a point of re-entry that fits very well, to within a few dozen kilometres," he told AFP.

Aldoria, which has 15 telescopes around the world, searches for information on launches and then works out flight paths based on "the typical trajectories of each of the main launch sites".

But Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, is not convinced.

It was McDowell who identified a piece of the International Space Station (ISS) that crashed down on a house in Florida last April.

"I do not believe this object came from space. Maybe fell off an airplane," he told AFP. "Give me evidence it is space debris."

He has not however entirely ruled out that it is part of an Ariane 5 V184 launch in 2008 that finally returned to earth.

But the French aerospace group told AFP: "This piece does not belong to an element from a European launcher operated by Arianespace."

John Crassidis at New York's SUNY, which works with NASA on space debris, endorsed the assessment released by the Kenya Space Agency.

"I think their technical assessments are 100 percent accurate, and they're going to figure out what country it came from, because every country does things a little bit differently," he said.

While it could be a separation ring from a rocket, as the KSA was considering, it might also have come from the upper stage of a rocket. "Those tend to be smaller," he told AFP.

Christophe Bonnal, a French specialist in space debris, said the debris might have come from a military launcher.

"They are armoured, which fits with the fact that it is very big and heavy," he said. But then it could also have come from a digger or a tank, he added.

- Assessing the risk

So far, at least, such incidents have not caused any deaths, but since the number of space launches is rising, so too are the risks.

"Ten years ago, an object that might create impact fragments re-entered the atmosphere every two weeks," said Stijn Lemmens, a specialist in debris at the European Space Agency (ESA). "Now, that can happen twice a week."

For Lucken, at Aldoria, it is just a question of time.

"It's going to end up falling on critical infrastructure, like a nuclear power station, an oil tanker or homes," he warned.

"It's our Sword of Damocles," said Christophe Bonnal, referring to the parable of the sword suspended by a thread over a ruler's head.

But geography plays in our favour, he added, given that 71 percent of the planet is covered by ocean and 10 percent by deserts. Only 3.3 percent of Earth is densely populated, he said.

So far, said Lucken, about 30,000 pieces of debris measuring more than 10 centimetres have been identified orbiting the earth, and more than a million larger than one centimetre.

All of them were potentially dangerous, he added.

And that catalogue is not an exhaustive list, Bonnal pointed out, since it does not include various military objects launched into space.

"If it's a piece of a US missile, we'll probably never know," he said.

In Europe, said Lucken, there are rules obliging operators to ensure controlled re-entries in uninhabited zones, such as in the South Pacific -- or to be sure such objects would be completely destroyed.

"But that's the theory. Once the mission is launched, anything can happen."

And no one is going to be chasing them to pay out compensation if something goes wrong, he added.

And, as another observer noted, part of the problem lies elsewhere.

China is by far the worst offender, said Crassidis.

"We have these rules, but China and Russia don't really follow any rules."

burs-tsz-agu-tq-neo/jj/gv

I.Mansoor--DT