Dubai Telegraph - US Supreme Court appears inclined to rein in federal agencies

EUR -
AED 3.877617
AFN 71.807807
ALL 97.772617
AMD 410.869543
ANG 1.895795
AOA 964.384836
ARS 1057.55224
AUD 1.623661
AWG 1.894435
AZN 1.78834
BAM 1.947856
BBD 2.123957
BDT 125.707294
BGN 1.956859
BHD 0.39796
BIF 3106.857885
BMD 1.055704
BND 1.409166
BOB 7.295246
BRL 6.100939
BSD 1.051925
BTN 88.833685
BWP 14.311832
BYN 3.442492
BYR 20691.802984
BZD 2.120372
CAD 1.477094
CDF 3029.870901
CHF 0.934506
CLF 0.037175
CLP 1025.775052
CNY 7.650481
CNH 7.653977
COP 4637.06472
CRC 534.724154
CUC 1.055704
CUP 27.976162
CVE 109.817103
CZK 25.300695
DJF 187.317785
DKK 7.45859
DOP 63.352214
DZD 140.860582
EGP 52.523718
ERN 15.835564
ETB 129.4699
FJD 2.397768
FKP 0.833285
GBP 0.83341
GEL 2.897931
GGP 0.833285
GHS 16.756657
GIP 0.833285
GMD 74.423577
GNF 9066.109095
GTQ 8.120878
GYD 219.972825
HKD 8.2172
HNL 26.579099
HRK 7.530612
HTG 138.1877
HUF 410.087781
IDR 16788.864432
ILS 3.94277
IMP 0.833285
INR 89.071352
IQD 1377.97981
IRR 44450.426221
ISK 145.296679
JEP 0.833285
JMD 166.842681
JOD 0.748808
JPY 164.518836
KES 136.69227
KGS 91.319811
KHR 4272.614305
KMF 490.66493
KPW 950.13341
KRW 1475.338096
KWD 0.324703
KYD 0.876625
KZT 521.981062
LAK 23064.149669
LBP 94199.393249
LKR 306.054633
LRD 191.45187
LSL 19.016418
LTL 3.11722
LVL 0.638584
LYD 5.131121
MAD 10.510034
MDL 19.118206
MGA 4917.01546
MKD 61.545741
MMK 3428.886171
MNT 3587.28293
MOP 8.433205
MRU 41.865645
MUR 48.857678
MVR 16.310698
MWK 1824.08625
MXN 21.346443
MYR 4.720585
MZN 67.522783
NAD 19.01893
NGN 1768.103947
NIO 38.712475
NOK 11.659599
NPR 142.135636
NZD 1.795711
OMR 0.406451
PAB 1.05191
PEN 3.992018
PGK 4.232776
PHP 62.226904
PKR 292.329865
PLN 4.334394
PYG 8192.663234
QAR 3.836353
RON 4.97638
RSD 116.9868
RUB 105.955952
RWF 1446.926019
SAR 3.963348
SBD 8.835737
SCR 14.11749
SDG 635.001454
SEK 11.611532
SGD 1.417573
SHP 0.833285
SLE 23.857186
SLL 22137.594933
SOS 601.159516
SRD 37.518143
STD 21850.946183
SVC 9.204459
SYP 2652.488409
SZL 19.013721
THB 36.624451
TJS 11.181794
TMT 3.705522
TND 3.314482
TOP 2.472567
TRY 36.389597
TTD 7.142867
TWD 34.361069
TZS 2800.256971
UAH 43.428889
UGX 3873.202862
USD 1.055704
UYU 45.155829
UZS 13490.976078
VES 48.5521
VND 26841.280147
VUV 125.335328
WST 2.947094
XAF 653.301744
XAG 0.034141
XAU 0.000401
XCD 2.853094
XDR 0.800148
XOF 653.301744
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.821137
ZAR 19.125085
ZMK 9502.594831
ZMW 29.059753
ZWL 339.936333
  • RBGPF

    59.6500

    59.65

    +100%

  • CMSC

    -0.0590

    24.565

    -0.24%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0700

    6.62

    -1.06%

  • SCS

    -0.1100

    13.09

    -0.84%

  • AZN

    0.4100

    63.8

    +0.64%

  • VOD

    0.0000

    8.92

    0%

  • GSK

    -0.2300

    33.46

    -0.69%

  • BTI

    0.2500

    36.93

    +0.68%

  • RELX

    0.2500

    45.29

    +0.55%

  • NGG

    0.6800

    63.58

    +1.07%

  • RIO

    0.3100

    62.43

    +0.5%

  • BCC

    -3.3600

    138.18

    -2.43%

  • CMSD

    -0.0460

    24.344

    -0.19%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    27.31

    +0.29%

  • BP

    -0.3300

    29.09

    -1.13%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.26

    +0.23%

US Supreme Court appears inclined to rein in federal agencies
US Supreme Court appears inclined to rein in federal agencies / Photo: SAUL LOEB - AFP/File

US Supreme Court appears inclined to rein in federal agencies

The conservative-leaning US Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared inclined to weaken the power of federal agencies, which regulate myriad issues affecting the everyday lives of Americans -- from consumer safety to air pollution.

Text size:

At the heart of the matter is a 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which said judges should defer to government agencies in determining a "reasonable" interpretation of the law if the language is ambiguous.

At the time, the case was a win for the administration of Republican president Ronald Reagan, who accused the country's progressive federal judges of burying corporate America under masses of unnecessary and restrictive red tape.

But the political right has since decried the ruling, saying it unfairly empowers the central government over the judiciary, and means agencies can alter the meaning of statutes, depending on who's in charge.

On Wednesday, the nine justices barely touched the facts of the current case on the docket, which relates to a rule requiring fishing boats in the US northeast to pay for federal observers boarding their vessels to keep watch on overfishing.

Instead, they quickly pivoted to how the precedent set in the Chevron case affected the proceedings -- and how that 1984 ruling might be outdated.

- 'Flood of litigation' -

Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden, argued that overruling the Chevron decision would spark an "unwarranted shock to the legal system."

She warned that lower courts could get clogged with cases, and a situation could arise where statutes would be interpreted differently in various states based on the interpretation of judges.

"You lose the uniformity value, and it diminishes the force of the political accountability value," she said.

But most of the six right-leaning justices seemed unmoved by her arguments.

"Chevron itself ushers in shocks to the system every four or eight years when a new administration comes in -- whether it's communications law, or securities law or competition law, environmental law..." said Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The court's three progressive justices, all women, called for maintaining the status quo.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee, said she was "worried about the courts becoming uber-legislators."

"Isn't it sort of impractical and chaotic to have a world in which every undefined term in a statute is subject to litigation, if you're trying to govern?" she said.

For Justice Elena Kagan, "it's best to defer to people who do know, who have had long experience on the ground."

"Judges should know what they don't know," Kagan added.

Amy Coney Barrett, who was appointed by Biden's Republican predecessor Donald Trump and whose vote could be decisive for the majority, asked about the possibility of an eventual "flood of litigation."

The court's decision is not expected for several months.

In June 2022, the Supreme Court had already limited the power of federal agencies to an extent.

It ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency did not have overarching power to regulate emissions from coal-fired power plants, saying that "it is not credible that Congress gave the EPA the authority to pass such a measure."

S.Mohideen--DT